Alle Beiträge von Markus Saurer

Selbständiger ökonomischer Berater

Ordnungs- und staatspolitischer Sündenfall

Bundesrat und Parlament wollen die «Fair-Preis-Initiative» trotz Ablehnung als Gesetz verankern. Ein Kommentar von FuW-Redaktor Peter Morf.

Hauchdünn ist die Konzernverantwortungsinitiative Ende November abgelehnt worden, wegen des Ständemehrs. Das ist nicht nur darum erfreulich, weil sie inhaltlich falsch war, sondern auch, weil sie in der Praxis kaum umsetzbar gewesen wäre. Nun steht schon der nächste Vorstoss im Brennpunkt des Interesses, der auch nicht umsetzbar ist. Gemeint ist die Initiative «Stop der Hochpreisinsel – für faire Preise». Sie wurde von Konsumentenschutzkreisen lanciert, mit Unterstützung des Gewerbes und von Parlamentariern aus allen Fraktionen.

Lesen Sie den interessanten Kommentar von Peter Morf in „Finanz und Wirtschaft“ online.

Big Tech and the Parable of the Broken Window

(Truth on the Market – Reblog)

Corbin K. Barthold 
4 August 2020

A boy throws a brick through a bakeshop window. He flees and is never identified. The townspeople gather around the broken glass. “Well,” one of them says to the furious baker, “at least this will generate some business for the windowmaker!”

A reasonable statement? Not really. Although it is indeed a good day for the windowmaker, the money for the new window comes from the baker. Perhaps the baker was planning to use that money to buy a new suit. Now, instead of owning a window and a suit, he owns only a window. The windowmaker’s gain, meanwhile, is simply the tailor’s loss.

This parable of the broken window was conceived by Frédéric Bastiat, a nineteenth-century French economist. He wanted to alert the reader to the importance of opportunity costs—in his words, “that which is not seen.” Time and money spent on one activity cannot be spent on another.

Today Bastiat might tell the parable of the harassed technology company. A tech firm creates a revolutionary new product or service and grows very large. Rivals, lawyers, activists, and politicians call for an antitrust probe. Eventually they get their way. Millions of documents are produced, dozens of depositions are taken, and several hearings are held. In the end no concrete action is taken. “Well,” the critics say, “at least other companies could grow while the firm was sidetracked by the investigation!”

Consider the antitrust case against Microsoft twenty years ago. The case ultimately settled, and Microsoft agreed merely to modify minor aspects of how it sold its products. “It’s worth wondering,” writes Brian McCullough, a generally astute historian of the internet, “how much the flowering of the dot-com era was enabled by the fact that the most dominant, rapacious player in the industry was distracted while the new era was taking shape.” “It’s easy to see,” McCullough says, “that the antitrust trial hobbled Microsoft strategically, and maybe even creatively.”

Lesen Sie hier weiter: Big Tech and the Parable of the Broken Window